Romanticism Comes of Age
I am rereading Owen Barfield's Romanticism Comes of Age, a collection of essays written between 1929 and 1966, roughly. The edition of the book is a newly printed one published by The Barfield Press, a just recently created press for the very purpose of bringing back to print eight titles of Barfield's that have been out of print.
I've finished the first two essays, "East And West", and "Thinking and Thought." The first time I read this collection of essays, both Barfield and philosophy were new enough to me that they were indistinguishable, so far as content and style were concerned. On this reading, Barfield's voice is more obvious and separate from the topics he takes up with. Not only that, but the period in which he writes is more noticeable. He's clearly not a contemporary, judging by the authors he discusses - Croce re aesthetics, I. A. Richards re literary criticism - and by his writing style.
In spite of all that, and evident even after two short essays, Barfield takes the reader down paths that are still not common, seventy years later. That may be because he's writing hogwash; it may be for other, insignificant reasons. I really don't know. But I find his work still challenging, and relevant, and worthwhile.
Comments
http://www.hermetic.com/bey/mundus_imaginalis.htm
It's extraordinary. Medieval Oriental Sufi mysticism meets modern Western European romanticism.
As to Barfield's style and sources, it just demonstrates how unhealthily quick things have changed in our world over the past decades. We have to dig deeper and deeper in order to maintain contact.
Vlad Ioan
You wrote:
Medieval Oriental Sufi mysticism meets modern Western European romanticism.
What Barfield said was, "When medieval Oriental Sufi mysticism meets modern Western European consciousness, one result is Romanticism." Is this different from what you meant?
Thanks for reading and responding.
Ciao.
Danny
Owen Barfield
(This is a part from an article about Owen Barfield that you can read here :
http://www.lapismagazine.org/archives/L03/lachman.html )
Conclusion: one thing is to read an author (if you happily live in a part of the world where you can afford to buy him...), and totally another thing is to understand him.
Along with ignoring, misunderstanding is the main danger that threatens a philosophy.